Flare FAssets | Mainnet Audit Comp
Reports by Severity
High
- 45893 - [SC - High] Agent role can stolen nat token from protocol users
- 45904 - [SC - High] Malicious agent can forge a non-payment proof despite user's valid payment and fraudulently trigger mintingPaymentDefault
- 45979 - [SC - High] Agent can steal funds from FLR holders who have deposited in agent's collateral pool
- 46121 - [SC - High] Malicious agent can manipulate the totalCollateral to cause damage to the protocol
- 46282 - [SC - High] Wrong implementation of payout would lead to loss of fee share of AgentVault
- 46378 - [SC - High] Unconditional F-Asset burn during partial collateral redemptions enables direct theft of user funds
- 46437 - [SC - High] Agent can circumvent double payment challenge on XRP chain using other types of transaction
- 46541 - [SC - High] Historical Payment Transaction Exploitation Leading to Instant Agent Liquidation
- 46592 - [SC - High] The return value of redeemFromAgent/redeemFromAgentInCollateral in the selfCloseExitTo is not checked
- 46688 - [SC - High] claimAirdropDistribution() Allows Arbitrary Inflation of totalCollateral
- 46858 - [SC - High] The agent owner can exploit a malicious rewardManager to steal tokens from the protocol
- 46949 - [SC - High] Top-up discount miscalculation allows minting excess pool tokens via repeated small deposits in CollateralPool::enter
- 46953 - [SC - High] AGENTS WHO CREATE AGENTS WITH PRIOR TRANSACTIONS CAN BE INSTANTLY UNFAIRLY LIQUIDATED
- 46985 - [SC - High] CollateralPool::totalCollateral can be increased to arbitrary value
- 47020 - [SC - High] A malicious agent can extract funds from the collateral pool by diluting the value of existing collateral providers' shares.
- 47060 - [SC - High] Unchecked Partial Payout on selfCloseExit Allows User Underpayment
- 47108 - [SC - High] selfCloseExitTo() can cause users to receive partial payments without validation, leading to permanent asset loss
Medium
- 45447 - [SC - Medium] Executor cannot execute minting while the agent can execute the transaction and steal executor fee
- 45478 - [SC - Medium] Minting Cap Check Doesn't Include poolFeeUBA in selfMint and mintFromUnderlying
- 45514 - [SC - Medium] Malicious agents can trap stakers by raising the exit collateral ratio
- 45554 - [SC - Medium] Fee loss during Agent's feeBIPS reduction in selfMint function
- 45550 - [SC - Medium] [H-01] illegalPaymentChallenge is vulnerable to frontrunning by external challengers stealing the reward
- 45665 - [SC - Medium] [H-02] Minting Cap Bypass via Pool Fee Exclusion during Self Mint
- 45769 - [SC - Medium] Permanent blocking of Agent's fund by allowed minters
- 45830 - [SC - Medium] Incorrect amount passed to checkMintingCap in self-minting allows bypassing of config minting cap
- 45910 - [SC - Medium] Changing collateral ratio makes Agents prone to liquidation
- 45987 - [SC - Medium] A malicious user can fill up the redemption queue with the minimum size (1 lot), making legitimate redeemers to redeem always multiple times
- 46081 - [SC - Medium] Wrong check in redeemFromCoreVault will result in unnecessary revert
- 46108 - [SC - Medium] Minting Cap can by bypassed while self minting
- 46247 - [SC - Medium] Token transfer can revert in unstickMinting because of insufficient funds in the vault.
- 46265 - [SC - Medium] Logic flaw in transferToCoreVault allows creation of zero-value redemption request
- 46271 - [SC - Medium] Rewards claiming functionality is broken.
- 46326 - [SC - Medium] Incorrect Minting Cap Check in Minting Process
- 46714 - [SC - Medium] Agent can frontrun executor to steal unclaimed executor fee in minting process
- 46826 - [SC - Medium] transferFeeWei + Transfers.TRANSFER_GAS_ALLOWANCE when CoreVault::transferToCoreVault() is called.
- 46929 - [SC - Medium] Incorrect required underlying value check used in mintFromFreeUnderlying function
- 46943 - [SC - Medium] Agents can prevent user CoreVault redemptions by sandwiching them with a requestReturnFromCoreVault and a cancelReturnFromCoreVault
- 47034 - [SC - Medium] check minting cap function checks on incorrect amount in mintFromFreeUnderlying function
- 47039 - [SC - Medium] poolMintFee is not considered for or checked against themintingCapAMG limits.
Low
- 45379 - [SC - Low] Frontrunning Vulnerability in createAgentVault Suffix Reservation
- 45439 - [SC - Low] Empty String Allowed as Pool Token Suffix in _reserveAndValidatePoolTokenSuffix
- 45499 - [SC - Low] Malicious user can prevent agent to be destroyed and lock up his funds
- 45533 - [SC - Low] Incorrect gas allowance comparison in CoreVault transfer function leads to user fund loss
- 45604 - [SC - Low] User Overpayment in transferToCoreVault Fee Handling
- 45897 - [SC - Low] Executor Fee Lost in rejectInvalidRedemption() Due to Missing Handling Logic
- 45943 - [SC - Low] rejectInvalidRedemption fee is not awarded to agent, resulting in stuck or misallocated funds
- 46068 - [SC - Low] selfCloseExitTo is lack of slippage protect
- 46071 - [SC - Low] Ultra-low amount of total shares in collateral pool
- 46119 - [SC - Low] Incorrect msg.Value check in CoreVault Transfer
- 46320 - [SC - Low] Executor fee will be stuck in the contract when rejectInvalidRedemption is called
- 46442 - [SC - Low] Agent collateral pool is vulnerable to inflation attack
- 46486 - [SC - Low] Faulty logic in transferToCoreVault makes users pay more for the refund transaction than the amount being refunded.
- 46462 - [SC - Low] Malicious collateral provider can steal funds from agent collateral pool by donating a large amount of native token to the pool (inflation attack)
- 46520 - [SC - Low] ETH loss on selfCloseExitTo when redeeming to collateral
- 46587 - [SC - Low] Overpayment loss in transferToCoreVault due to incorrect refund condition
- 46643 - [SC - Low] destroyAgent in AgentsCreateDestroy is prone to DOS
- 46681 - [SC - Low] malicious actor can prevent agent from being destroyed
- 46758 - [SC - Low] Collateral Reservation Fee Calculation Inconsistent with Actual Reserved Value
- 46838 - [SC - Low] Agent Destruction Can Be Blocked by Malicious Collateral Pool Entries
- 46836 - [SC - Low] buybackAgentCollateral will revert due to overflow
- 46847 - [SC - Low] executor fee is not paid or burned in rejectInvalidRedemption
- 46886 - [SC - Low] destroyAgent() functionality can easily be bricked due to Frontrunning Attack
- 46924 - [SC - Low] Last user may exit with almost all of his values, but he'll purposefully leave a small 1e18 or a little more to grief destroy()
- 46930 - [SC - Low] depositNat() in CollateralPool Fails to Notify Asset Manager, By not calling the updateCollateral
- 46969 - [SC - Low] Inconsistent Use of poolFeeShareBIPS Between Collateral Reservation and Distribution
- 46976 - [SC - Low] Agent Destruction Can Permanently Lock Unclaimed Transfer Fees
- 46984 - [SC - Low] Incomplete Token Supply Check After Token Share Recalculation in _selfCloseExitTo
- 46993 - [SC - Low] Malicious agent with large capital can abuse cancelReturnFromCoreVault to block access to core vault liquidity during high redemption demand
- 47010 - [SC - Low] CollateralPool::donateNat manipulation enables arbitrary pool‐token value inflation and fee‐debt evasion
- 47033 - [SC - Low] Incorrect calculation of total available amount in core vault in a certain case when a user redeems from the core vault
- 47053 - [SC - Low] transferToCoreVault() allows agents to have unbacked synthetic assets by extracting underlying value without burning
- 47082 - [SC - Low] Zero collateral payout despite burned fAssets
- 47106 - [SC - Low] Collateral Reservation Fee distribution uses current poolFeeShareBips instead of value stored during during time of collateral reservation
- 45336 - [SC - Low] Malicious Agent could repeatedly create and destroy vaults reserving different suffixes and grief other agents
Insight
- 45309 - [SC - Insight] Gas Optimization in _burnForAtNow Function for efficient balance retrieval
- 45310 - [SC - Insight] IWNat(address(token)).governanceVotePower().undelegate() is redundant after undelegateGovernance()
- 45357 - [SC - Insight] Increase in the usedTokens array
- 45368 - [SC - Insight] Corruptible Upgradability Pattern
- 45377 - [SC - Insight] Missing pause modifier in beforeCollateralWithdrawal allows collateral theft during a pause
- 45405 - [SC - Insight] Insufficient Documentation for Governance-Controlled Functions and Critical Parameters in 'CoreVaultManager.sol'
- 45450 - [SC - Insight] Outdated underlying chain data lead to shortened minting windows or DoS when minting fAssets
- 45485 - [SC - Insight] Comments above reserveCollateral indicate collateral reservation fee is burned, which is not the case
- 45517 - [SC - Insight] Partial Documentation for Self-Close Exit Fee Handling and Redemption Workflow in 'CollateralPool.sol'
- 45574 - [SC - Insight] Redundant Per‑Item Upper Bound Check in validateLiquidationFactors
- 45674 - [SC - Insight] executeMinting() allows impersonation of minter during chain-reorg due to deterministic crtId and lack of minter binding
- 45731 - [SC - Insight] Off-by-One Logic in Escrow End Timestamp Calculation May Cause Unintended Escrow Delay
- 45685 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect comments in finishRedemptionWithoutPayment
- 45772 - [SC - Insight] NatSpec Mismatch in CoreVault Redemption Logic
- 45813 - [SC - Insight] Missing setAutoClaiming Function
- 45864 - [SC - Insight] Minter's underlying token can get stuck if the agent calls mintingDefault before the minter’s transaction is recorded on the underlying blockchain.
- 45949 - [SC - Insight] Mismatch between doc and implementation for confirmationByOthersAfterSeconds minimum on XRP
- 45956 - [SC - Insight] EOA only on smart contract chains bypassed on ETH
- 45978 - [SC - Insight] Failed Transactions Trigger Invalid Double Payment Challenges Causing Loss of Funds for Legitimate Agents
- 45961 - [SC - Insight] selfMint() Can Lead to Permanent Loss of Agents' Funds During Emergency Pause
- 46092 - [SC - Insight] AgentVault::destroy mismatch between comment documentation and contract behavior
- 46122 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect Minimum Lots Validation in CoreVault Redemption
- 46198 - [SC - Insight] Redemption Blocked if Agent Refuses to Confirm Core Vault Payment
- 46210 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect timestamp comparison in function "beforeCollateralWithdrawal" allows agent to withdraw at last second without being challenged
- 46218 - [SC - Insight] Documentation-Implementation Discrepancy in Agent Vault Access Control
- 46220 - [SC - Insight] Missing Documented Function in the CollateralPool Contract
- 46241 - [SC - Insight] Misleading definition in Core-Vault documentation (“CV operators submit proof”)
- 46266 - [SC - Insight] Cannot use a pool token suffix of MAX_SUFFIX_LEN
- 46311 - [SC - Insight] Unbacked Redemptions Due to Donation- Attack on CoreVault Can Freeze Agent Collateral
- 46493 - [SC - Insight] ADDRESS_STORAGE_POSITION is not ERC7201 compliant
- 46534 - [SC - Insight] Missing Validation to Prevent Self-Assignment of Work Address
- 46546 - [SC - Insight] Accounting Mismatches in AgentVault.sol Due to Non-Standard ERC20 Tokens
- 46677 - [SC - Insight] Wrong comment in _getFAssetRequiredToNotSpoilCR
- 46702 - [SC - Insight] executeMinting() Enables Cross-Contract Reentrancy to Manipulate Collateral Pool Pricing
- 46721 - [SC - Insight] Inconsistencies for agentTimelockedOperationWindowSeconds value checks between SettingsInitializer.sol::_validateSettings and SettingsManagementFacet.sol::setAgentTimelockedOpera...
- 46771 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect Collateral Ratio Check Due to Rounding Error
- 46848 - [SC - Insight] Minters can grief agents by deliberately fragmenting the agent's redemption ticket queue with minimal size tickets, preventing or delaying large transfers to core vault
- 46982 - [SC - Insight] Spread calculation discrepancy allows wildly divergent prices to be accepted
- 46999 - [SC - Insight] Absence of event emission in critical functions
- 47087 - [SC - Insight] CollateralTypesFacet.sol::deprecateCollateralType allows to break CollateralTypes.sol::initialize invariant because it allows to deprecate all token collateral vaults leading to ...
- 47091 - [SC - Insight] setWorkAddress() enables front-running attacks to hijack work addresses
- 47094 - [SC - Insight] Missing Event Emission in AgentVault and CollateralPoolToken Factory Contracts
- 47116 - [SC - Insight] Undocumented Redemption Pool Fee Share potentially leading to confusion
- 47121 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect documentation on pool Top-up feature
- 47150 - [SC - Insight] XRP Deposit Authorization Griefing Attack on Minting Process
- 47159 - [SC - Insight] Lack of Access Control on triggerInstructions() Allows Unauthorized Transfers Post-Deletion
Reports by Type
Smart Contract
- 45309 - [SC - Insight] Gas Optimization in _burnForAtNow Function for efficient balance retrieval
- 45310 - [SC - Insight] IWNat(address(token)).governanceVotePower().undelegate() is redundant after undelegateGovernance()
- 45357 - [SC - Insight] Increase in the usedTokens array
- 45368 - [SC - Insight] Corruptible Upgradability Pattern
- 45377 - [SC - Insight] Missing pause modifier in beforeCollateralWithdrawal allows collateral theft during a pause
- 45379 - [SC - Low] Frontrunning Vulnerability in createAgentVault Suffix Reservation
- 45405 - [SC - Insight] Insufficient Documentation for Governance-Controlled Functions and Critical Parameters in 'CoreVaultManager.sol'
- 45439 - [SC - Low] Empty String Allowed as Pool Token Suffix in _reserveAndValidatePoolTokenSuffix
- 45447 - [SC - Medium] Executor cannot execute minting while the agent can execute the transaction and steal executor fee
- 45450 - [SC - Insight] Outdated underlying chain data lead to shortened minting windows or DoS when minting fAssets
- 45478 - [SC - Medium] Minting Cap Check Doesn't Include poolFeeUBA in selfMint and mintFromUnderlying
- 45485 - [SC - Insight] Comments above reserveCollateral indicate collateral reservation fee is burned, which is not the case
- 45499 - [SC - Low] Malicious user can prevent agent to be destroyed and lock up his funds
- 45514 - [SC - Medium] Malicious agents can trap stakers by raising the exit collateral ratio
- 45517 - [SC - Insight] Partial Documentation for Self-Close Exit Fee Handling and Redemption Workflow in 'CollateralPool.sol'
- 45533 - [SC - Low] Incorrect gas allowance comparison in CoreVault transfer function leads to user fund loss
- 45554 - [SC - Medium] Fee loss during Agent's feeBIPS reduction in selfMint function
- 45550 - [SC - Medium] [H-01] illegalPaymentChallenge is vulnerable to frontrunning by external challengers stealing the reward
- 45574 - [SC - Insight] Redundant Per‑Item Upper Bound Check in validateLiquidationFactors
- 45665 - [SC - Medium] [H-02] Minting Cap Bypass via Pool Fee Exclusion during Self Mint
- 45674 - [SC - Insight] executeMinting() allows impersonation of minter during chain-reorg due to deterministic crtId and lack of minter binding
- 45604 - [SC - Low] User Overpayment in transferToCoreVault Fee Handling
- 45731 - [SC - Insight] Off-by-One Logic in Escrow End Timestamp Calculation May Cause Unintended Escrow Delay
- 45685 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect comments in finishRedemptionWithoutPayment
- 45769 - [SC - Medium] Permanent blocking of Agent's fund by allowed minters
- 45772 - [SC - Insight] NatSpec Mismatch in CoreVault Redemption Logic
- 45830 - [SC - Medium] Incorrect amount passed to checkMintingCap in self-minting allows bypassing of config minting cap
- 45813 - [SC - Insight] Missing setAutoClaiming Function
- 45864 - [SC - Insight] Minter's underlying token can get stuck if the agent calls mintingDefault before the minter’s transaction is recorded on the underlying blockchain.
- 45893 - [SC - High] Agent role can stolen nat token from protocol users
- 45897 - [SC - Low] Executor Fee Lost in rejectInvalidRedemption() Due to Missing Handling Logic
- 45904 - [SC - High] Malicious agent can forge a non-payment proof despite user's valid payment and fraudulently trigger mintingPaymentDefault
- 45910 - [SC - Medium] Changing collateral ratio makes Agents prone to liquidation
- 45943 - [SC - Low] rejectInvalidRedemption fee is not awarded to agent, resulting in stuck or misallocated funds
- 45949 - [SC - Insight] Mismatch between doc and implementation for confirmationByOthersAfterSeconds minimum on XRP
- 45956 - [SC - Insight] EOA only on smart contract chains bypassed on ETH
- 45978 - [SC - Insight] Failed Transactions Trigger Invalid Double Payment Challenges Causing Loss of Funds for Legitimate Agents
- 45961 - [SC - Insight] selfMint() Can Lead to Permanent Loss of Agents' Funds During Emergency Pause
- 45987 - [SC - Medium] A malicious user can fill up the redemption queue with the minimum size (1 lot), making legitimate redeemers to redeem always multiple times
- 45979 - [SC - High] Agent can steal funds from FLR holders who have deposited in agent's collateral pool
- 46068 - [SC - Low] selfCloseExitTo is lack of slippage protect
- 46081 - [SC - Medium] Wrong check in redeemFromCoreVault will result in unnecessary revert
- 46071 - [SC - Low] Ultra-low amount of total shares in collateral pool
- 46092 - [SC - Insight] AgentVault::destroy mismatch between comment documentation and contract behavior
- 46108 - [SC - Medium] Minting Cap can by bypassed while self minting
- 46121 - [SC - High] Malicious agent can manipulate the totalCollateral to cause damage to the protocol
- 46119 - [SC - Low] Incorrect msg.Value check in CoreVault Transfer
- 46122 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect Minimum Lots Validation in CoreVault Redemption
- 46198 - [SC - Insight] Redemption Blocked if Agent Refuses to Confirm Core Vault Payment
- 46210 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect timestamp comparison in function "beforeCollateralWithdrawal" allows agent to withdraw at last second without being challenged
- 46218 - [SC - Insight] Documentation-Implementation Discrepancy in Agent Vault Access Control
- 46220 - [SC - Insight] Missing Documented Function in the CollateralPool Contract
- 46241 - [SC - Insight] Misleading definition in Core-Vault documentation (“CV operators submit proof”)
- 46247 - [SC - Medium] Token transfer can revert in unstickMinting because of insufficient funds in the vault.
- 46266 - [SC - Insight] Cannot use a pool token suffix of MAX_SUFFIX_LEN
- 46265 - [SC - Medium] Logic flaw in transferToCoreVault allows creation of zero-value redemption request
- 46282 - [SC - High] Wrong implementation of payout would lead to loss of fee share of AgentVault
- 46311 - [SC - Insight] Unbacked Redemptions Due to Donation- Attack on CoreVault Can Freeze Agent Collateral
- 46320 - [SC - Low] Executor fee will be stuck in the contract when rejectInvalidRedemption is called
- 46271 - [SC - Medium] Rewards claiming functionality is broken.
- 46326 - [SC - Medium] Incorrect Minting Cap Check in Minting Process
- 46378 - [SC - High] Unconditional F-Asset burn during partial collateral redemptions enables direct theft of user funds
- 46442 - [SC - Low] Agent collateral pool is vulnerable to inflation attack
- 46437 - [SC - High] Agent can circumvent double payment challenge on XRP chain using other types of transaction
- 46486 - [SC - Low] Faulty logic in transferToCoreVault makes users pay more for the refund transaction than the amount being refunded.
- 46462 - [SC - Low] Malicious collateral provider can steal funds from agent collateral pool by donating a large amount of native token to the pool (inflation attack)
- 46493 - [SC - Insight] ADDRESS_STORAGE_POSITION is not ERC7201 compliant
- 46520 - [SC - Low] ETH loss on selfCloseExitTo when redeeming to collateral
- 46534 - [SC - Insight] Missing Validation to Prevent Self-Assignment of Work Address
- 46541 - [SC - High] Historical Payment Transaction Exploitation Leading to Instant Agent Liquidation
- 46546 - [SC - Insight] Accounting Mismatches in AgentVault.sol Due to Non-Standard ERC20 Tokens
- 46587 - [SC - Low] Overpayment loss in transferToCoreVault due to incorrect refund condition
- 46592 - [SC - High] The return value of redeemFromAgent/redeemFromAgentInCollateral in the selfCloseExitTo is not checked
- 46643 - [SC - Low] destroyAgent in AgentsCreateDestroy is prone to DOS
- 46677 - [SC - Insight] Wrong comment in _getFAssetRequiredToNotSpoilCR
- 46681 - [SC - Low] malicious actor can prevent agent from being destroyed
- 46688 - [SC - High] claimAirdropDistribution() Allows Arbitrary Inflation of totalCollateral
- 46702 - [SC - Insight] executeMinting() Enables Cross-Contract Reentrancy to Manipulate Collateral Pool Pricing
- 46714 - [SC - Medium] Agent can frontrun executor to steal unclaimed executor fee in minting process
- 46721 - [SC - Insight] Inconsistencies for agentTimelockedOperationWindowSeconds value checks between SettingsInitializer.sol::_validateSettings and SettingsManagementFacet.sol::setAgentTimelockedOpera...
- 46758 - [SC - Low] Collateral Reservation Fee Calculation Inconsistent with Actual Reserved Value
- 46771 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect Collateral Ratio Check Due to Rounding Error
- 46826 - [SC - Medium] transferFeeWei + Transfers.TRANSFER_GAS_ALLOWANCE when CoreVault::transferToCoreVault() is called.
- 46838 - [SC - Low] Agent Destruction Can Be Blocked by Malicious Collateral Pool Entries
- 46836 - [SC - Low] buybackAgentCollateral will revert due to overflow
- 46847 - [SC - Low] executor fee is not paid or burned in rejectInvalidRedemption
- 46848 - [SC - Insight] Minters can grief agents by deliberately fragmenting the agent's redemption ticket queue with minimal size tickets, preventing or delaying large transfers to core vault
- 46886 - [SC - Low] destroyAgent() functionality can easily be bricked due to Frontrunning Attack
- 46858 - [SC - High] The agent owner can exploit a malicious rewardManager to steal tokens from the protocol
- 46924 - [SC - Low] Last user may exit with almost all of his values, but he'll purposefully leave a small 1e18 or a little more to grief destroy()
- 46930 - [SC - Low] depositNat() in CollateralPool Fails to Notify Asset Manager, By not calling the updateCollateral
- 46929 - [SC - Medium] Incorrect required underlying value check used in mintFromFreeUnderlying function
- 46943 - [SC - Medium] Agents can prevent user CoreVault redemptions by sandwiching them with a requestReturnFromCoreVault and a cancelReturnFromCoreVault
- 46949 - [SC - High] Top-up discount miscalculation allows minting excess pool tokens via repeated small deposits in CollateralPool::enter
- 46953 - [SC - High] AGENTS WHO CREATE AGENTS WITH PRIOR TRANSACTIONS CAN BE INSTANTLY UNFAIRLY LIQUIDATED
- 46969 - [SC - Low] Inconsistent Use of poolFeeShareBIPS Between Collateral Reservation and Distribution
- 46976 - [SC - Low] Agent Destruction Can Permanently Lock Unclaimed Transfer Fees
- 46982 - [SC - Insight] Spread calculation discrepancy allows wildly divergent prices to be accepted
- 46984 - [SC - Low] Incomplete Token Supply Check After Token Share Recalculation in _selfCloseExitTo
- 46985 - [SC - High] CollateralPool::totalCollateral can be increased to arbitrary value
- 46993 - [SC - Low] Malicious agent with large capital can abuse cancelReturnFromCoreVault to block access to core vault liquidity during high redemption demand
- 46999 - [SC - Insight] Absence of event emission in critical functions
- 47010 - [SC - Low] CollateralPool::donateNat manipulation enables arbitrary pool‐token value inflation and fee‐debt evasion
- 47020 - [SC - High] A malicious agent can extract funds from the collateral pool by diluting the value of existing collateral providers' shares.
- 47034 - [SC - Medium] check minting cap function checks on incorrect amount in mintFromFreeUnderlying function
- 47039 - [SC - Medium] poolMintFee is not considered for or checked against themintingCapAMG limits.
- 47033 - [SC - Low] Incorrect calculation of total available amount in core vault in a certain case when a user redeems from the core vault
- 47053 - [SC - Low] transferToCoreVault() allows agents to have unbacked synthetic assets by extracting underlying value without burning
- 47060 - [SC - High] Unchecked Partial Payout on selfCloseExit Allows User Underpayment
- 47082 - [SC - Low] Zero collateral payout despite burned fAssets
- 47087 - [SC - Insight] CollateralTypesFacet.sol::deprecateCollateralType allows to break CollateralTypes.sol::initialize invariant because it allows to deprecate all token collateral vaults leading to ...
- 47091 - [SC - Insight] setWorkAddress() enables front-running attacks to hijack work addresses
- 47106 - [SC - Low] Collateral Reservation Fee distribution uses current poolFeeShareBips instead of value stored during during time of collateral reservation
- 47094 - [SC - Insight] Missing Event Emission in AgentVault and CollateralPoolToken Factory Contracts
- 47108 - [SC - High] selfCloseExitTo() can cause users to receive partial payments without validation, leading to permanent asset loss
- 47116 - [SC - Insight] Undocumented Redemption Pool Fee Share potentially leading to confusion
- 47121 - [SC - Insight] Incorrect documentation on pool Top-up feature
- 47150 - [SC - Insight] XRP Deposit Authorization Griefing Attack on Minting Process
- 47159 - [SC - Insight] Lack of Access Control on triggerInstructions() Allows Unauthorized Transfers Post-Deletion
- 45336 - [SC - Low] Malicious Agent could repeatedly create and destroy vaults reserving different suffixes and grief other agents