#41359 [SC-Insight] Remove Manager of Address 0 is irrelevant and will never be reached
Submitted on Mar 14th 2025 at 09:48:30 UTC by @styphoiz for Audit Comp | Yeet
Report ID: #41359
Report Type: Smart Contract
Report severity: Insight
Target: https://github.com/immunefi-team/audit-comp-yeet/blob/main/src/StakeV2.sol
Impacts:
Description
Brief/Intro
The check for removing a manager with address 0 is unnecessary because the process does not allow adding a manager with address 0 in the first place.
Vulnerability Details
The code contains a check for address 0 in the removeManager function, but this condition can never be met since the addManager function explicitly prevents adding address 0 as a manager.
Impact Details
The following code demonstrates why the check in removeManager is redundant:
In the addManager function, there is a validation that rejects address 0:
As a result, address 0 can never be added to the managers mapping.
Consequently, the following check in removeManager serves no purpose, as address 0 cannot exist in the managers mapping:
Therefore, this line in removeManager is redundant and can be safely removed as this will already be rejected as Manager does not exist
References
Proof of Concept
Proof of Concept
See below PoC showcasing this test, PoC has been updated from the StakeV2.test.sol test case.
Was this helpful?